<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Scalability with Multiple Rollback Segments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/</link>
	<description>&#34;The word&#34; about InnoDB Products and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL 5.5 Feature List &#124; CastlerockResearch India Developer Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-24563</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL 5.5 Feature List &#124; CastlerockResearch India Developer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-24563</guid>
		<description>[...] http://planet.mysql.com/entry/?id=22648 http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/ http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/09/mysql-5-5-innodb-as-default-storage-engine/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://planet.mysql.com/entry/?id=22648" rel="nofollow">http://planet.mysql.com/entry/?id=22648</a> <a href="http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/</a> <a href="http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/09/mysql-5-5-innodb-as-default-storage-engine/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/09/mysql-5-5-innodb-as-default-storage-engine/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Mäkelä</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-13716</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Mäkelä</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-13716</guid>
		<description>@Cvecara Beograd, the maximum table size does not have anything to do with the undo logging of transactions. InnoDB supports up to 4,294,967,296 (2^32) pages per tablespace. Older versions of InnoDB limit it to 2,415,919,104 (0x90000000) pages when applying the redo log in crash recovery. 2^32 pages of 16 kilobytes (2^14 bytes) would be 2^46 bytes, or 64 TiB per tablespace, but that figure will include some administrative overhead (allocation and insert buffer bitmap pages, node pointer pages, B-tree leaf page headers and footers).

In the past, InnoDB did return the misleading error code HA_ERR_RECORD_FILE_FULL when it failed to allocate an undo log segment. Currently, it returns the code HA_ERR_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS, which is mapped to ER_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cvecara Beograd, the maximum table size does not have anything to do with the undo logging of transactions. InnoDB supports up to 4,294,967,296 (2^32) pages per tablespace. Older versions of InnoDB limit it to 2,415,919,104 (0&#215;90000000) pages when applying the redo log in crash recovery. 2^32 pages of 16 kilobytes (2^14 bytes) would be 2^46 bytes, or 64 TiB per tablespace, but that figure will include some administrative overhead (allocation and insert buffer bitmap pages, node pointer pages, B-tree leaf page headers and footers).</p>
<p>In the past, InnoDB did return the misleading error code HA_ERR_RECORD_FILE_FULL when it failed to allocate an undo log segment. Currently, it returns the code HA_ERR_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS, which is mapped to ER_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piyush</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-13490</link>
		<dc:creator>Piyush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-13490</guid>
		<description>@Harpej Singh, check the Disk Space Available dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Harpej Singh, check the Disk Space Available dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cvecara Beograd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-12831</link>
		<dc:creator>Cvecara Beograd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-12831</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also interested in resolving large table issue.
What is the limit there. We are speaking about 100 billions in one table here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also interested in resolving large table issue.<br />
What is the limit there. We are speaking about 100 billions in one table here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harpej Singh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-10774</link>
		<dc:creator>Harpej Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-10774</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir/Mam
 I am facing a problem with MYSQL that we can&#039;t store more then 123999475 rows. here 43 fields are in each row. ok. now error displayed 
ERROR-CODE-1114(HY000). Table is full. now how we rectify thease problem please send me solution about this problem
thanks

Harpej Singh
Ajmer- Rajasthan (INDIA)
(91)9214311070</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir/Mam<br />
 I am facing a problem with MYSQL that we can&#8217;t store more then 123999475 rows. here 43 fields are in each row. ok. now error displayed<br />
ERROR-CODE-1114(HY000). Table is full. now how we rectify thease problem please send me solution about this problem<br />
thanks</p>
<p>Harpej Singh<br />
Ajmer- Rajasthan (INDIA)<br />
(91)9214311070</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL 5.5.4 looks awesome. &#171; SmugMug&#39;s Don MacAskill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-10469</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL 5.5.4 looks awesome. &#171; SmugMug&#39;s Don MacAskill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-10469</guid>
		<description>[...] and behold, it&#8217;s fixed!  You can now have a whopping 128K transactions in flight.  Best of all, it&#8217;s far more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and behold, it&#8217;s fixed!  You can now have a whopping 128K transactions in flight.  Best of all, it&#8217;s far more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL 5.5.4 is Very Exicting &#171; Jeremy Zawodny&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-10436</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL 5.5.4 is Very Exicting &#171; Jeremy Zawodny&#39;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-10436</guid>
		<description>[...] Multiple Rollback Segments mean the 1,024 concurrent transaction limit goes away and concurrent transactions will have less mutex (lock) contention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Multiple Rollback Segments mean the 1,024 concurrent transaction limit goes away and concurrent transactions will have less mutex (lock) contention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Day</title>
		<link>http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/2010/04/innodb-multiple-rollback-segments/comment-page-1/#comment-10426</link>
		<dc:creator>James Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.innodb.com/wp/?p=485#comment-10426</guid>
		<description>Sunny, has this actually been tested with say MySQL 4.0 or 4.1 or 5.0 being able to use the extra rollback segments once they have been created with a later version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny, has this actually been tested with say MySQL 4.0 or 4.1 or 5.0 being able to use the extra rollback segments once they have been created with a later version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

